Bits of Freedom
Bits of Freedom

Tinkerer and thinker on everything free and open. Exploring possibilities and engaging with new opportunities to instigate change.

Jonas Öberg
Author

Jonas is a dad, husband, tinkerer, thinker and traveler. He's passionate about the future and bringing people together, from all fields of free and open.

Share


My Newsletters


If you're interested in what Commons Machinery, Elog.io, or myself are up to, I'd love for you to be part of my notification lists. It's pretty low volume, a few messages per month, depending on which notifications you sign up for. Thanks for taking an interest!

Read more & subscribe
Bits of Freedom

Updating the FSFE's self conception

Jonas ÖbergJonas Öberg

A while ago, I wrote on the FSFE's web mailing list a review I'm currently making of our web pages, and in particular our section which explain the organisation (About). One of the documents in this hierarchy, which I believe is critical to update, is our "Self Conception".

In principle, the document is good, but in several parts, the document hasn't been updated with the work distribution and authority of the various organs and thus is not consistent with neither current practice or authority. Most importantly, it pre-dates the Fellowship, and the position of Executive Director. While the document has seen some smaller updates over the years to at least mention Fellows, it's largely been unchanged since the 2004 version.

When I read through the document, I identified two two critical bugs:

Neither of this is true: decision making involve anyone who care to participate within one of our teams, regardless of if they're employees, volunteers, Fellows or part of our members. And as for employment, the only employment decided on by the General Assembly is that of the Executive Director.

I've now committed a new revision of the self conception with some limited updates, that bring the self conception closer in line with the actual structure (it's not perfectly aligned, nor will it be for some time). When discussing this in the core team (which include our members), comments I received were largely in favor of the changes with just some proposal of removing the document completely, which seems like it would've been a drastic measure to take.

There's a lot of work that's still needed to be done in cleaning up information about the organisation, as well as many formal documents which we'll eventually need to update (our constitution is not exempt from this; it still contains clauses that define national associations, which we don't have any in practice, as just one example).

Watch this space for more to come! :-)

Jonas Öberg
Author

Jonas Öberg

Jonas is a dad, husband, tinkerer, thinker and traveler. He's passionate about the future and bringing people together, from all fields of free and open.